LegalGurus.in
⚖️ BNS · Section 309

Robbery

This provision is now IPC Section 392 (Punishment for robbery) under the Indian Penal Code, effective from 1 July 2024. FIRs registered after that date cite the new section number.

What does this section state?

Section 309 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita consolidates the definition and punishment of robbery — previously spread across IPC Sections 390 to 392 — into a single section with multiple sub-clauses covering the general offence and its aggravated forms. Sub-clause (4) carries forward the general punishment for robbery: up to ten years' imprisonment and a fine, rising to fourteen years where the robbery is committed on a highway between sunset and sunrise.

The underlying definition of robbery — theft or extortion committed with force, the threat of instant force, or fear of instant harm — remains unchanged, as does its position as a more serious offence than ordinary theft but a step below dacoity, which requires five or more participants.

This consolidated structure mirrors the BNS's broader approach of combining related definitional and punishment sections that were previously separated across multiple provisions of the IPC.
Punishment Sub-clause (4): imprisonment up to 10 years, and fine (up to 14 years for highway robbery between sunset and sunrise)
Triable By Magistrate of the First Class / Court of Session
Bailable Non Bailable
Cognizable Cognizable
Compoundable Non Compoundable

Frequently Asked Questions

Is BNS Section 309 bailable?

This is a non bailable offence. Bail is not a matter of right and must be argued before a Magistrate or Sessions Court, typically with the help of a criminal lawyer.

What is the punishment under this section?

Sub-clause (4): imprisonment up to 10 years, and fine (up to 14 years for highway robbery between sunset and sunrise). Courts have discretion based on the facts of each case, and the actual outcome can vary.

Can a case under this section be compounded (settled)?

No — this is a non-compoundable offence. The complainant cannot withdraw the case by private settlement; prosecution continues regardless of any compromise.

Why are there multiple sub-clauses for robbery under BNS?

The BNS combined what were previously separate IPC sections (390 for definition, 392 for general punishment, plus related provisions) into a single section with sub-clauses, consolidating the structure without changing the underlying offence.

Is highway robbery still treated as an aggravated offence?

Yes — robbery committed on a highway between sunset and sunrise continues to carry an enhanced punishment of up to fourteen years, exactly as under the earlier IPC framework.

Does force alone qualify, or is a weapon required?

Force, the threat of instant force, or fear of instant harm is sufficient to constitute robbery — no weapon is required, consistent with how the offence was defined under the earlier IPC provisions.

Facing a case under this section?

Get a free case assessment from a verified criminal lawyer.

Talk to a Criminal Lawyer

This page is for general information only and is not a substitute for advice from a qualified advocate. Always verify against the current official bare act.