LegalGurus.in
🏛️ COI · Section 226

Power of High Courts to issue certain writs

What does this section state?

Article 226 empowers every High Court to issue writs — including habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, certiorari, and quo warranto — for the enforcement of fundamental rights, and additionally, for any other purpose, giving High Courts a broader writ jurisdiction than the Supreme Court's power under Article 32, which is limited specifically to fundamental rights.

Because of this wider scope, and because approaching a High Court is often faster and less expensive than the Supreme Court, Article 226 is usually the first port of call for a person seeking a constitutional remedy — whether that involves a fundamental rights violation, a challenge to an administrative decision, or another form of legal wrong for which the ordinary remedies are inadequate.

A High Court's writ jurisdiction under this article extends throughout its own territorial jurisdiction, and in certain circumstances, to matters where the cause of action arose within its jurisdiction even if the authority being challenged is located elsewhere.
Punishment Not applicable — not a criminal provision
Triable By High Court
Bailable Not Applicable
Cognizable Not Applicable
Compoundable Not Applicable

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this provision actually do?

See the explanation above. This is a civil, procedural, or constitutional provision rather than a criminal offence, so it doesn't carry a punishment — it defines a right, remedy, or procedure instead.

How is this different from Article 32?

Article 32 empowers only the Supreme Court, and only for enforcing fundamental rights. Article 226 gives every High Court a broader power, covering both fundamental rights and any other purpose, making it the wider and more commonly used remedy.

Why do most people approach the High Court first?

Approaching a High Court is generally faster, less expensive, and more geographically accessible than the Supreme Court, and Article 226’s broader scope means it can address a wider range of grievances beyond just fundamental rights violations.

Can a High Court’s writ jurisdiction extend beyond its own state?

Generally a High Court’s jurisdiction is limited to its own territory, but it can extend to authorities located outside that territory if a significant part of the cause of action arose within the High Court’s own jurisdiction.

Facing a case under this section?

Get a free case assessment from a verified criminal lawyer.

Talk to a Criminal Lawyer

This page is for general information only and is not a substitute for advice from a qualified advocate. Always verify against the current official bare act.