LegalGurus.in
⚖️ IPC · Section 406

Punishment for criminal breach of trust

This provision is now BNS Section 316 (Criminal breach of trust) under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, effective from 1 July 2024. FIRs registered after that date cite the new section number.

What does this section state?

This section punishes a person who, having been entrusted with property or given dominion over it, dishonestly misappropriates it, converts it to their own use, or disposes of it in violation of a legal contract or direction governing that trust. The key distinguishing element from theft is that the accused initially had lawful possession of the property, and the offence lies in breaching the trust under which they held it.

Common examples include an employee misusing funds they were authorised to handle, a partner diverting business assets for personal use, or an agent selling property entrusted to them without authorisation. The prosecution must show both entrustment and a dishonest, unauthorised dealing with the property — an honest mistake or business loss alone is not enough.

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita carries this offence forward as Section 316, with the same core elements.
Punishment Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both
Triable By Magistrate of the First Class
Bailable Bailable
Cognizable Non Cognizable
Compoundable Compoundable With Permission

Frequently Asked Questions

Is IPC Section 406 bailable?

This is a bailable offence, meaning bail can generally be granted as a matter of right by the police or the court.

What is the punishment under this section?

Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both. Courts have discretion based on the facts of each case, and the actual outcome can vary.

Can a case under this section be compounded (settled)?

Yes, but only with the permission of the court. The parties can reach a settlement, which the court must then approve before the case is closed.

What is the difference between criminal breach of trust and cheating (Section 420)?

Cheating involves deceiving someone from the outset to dishonestly induce them to hand over property. Criminal breach of trust involves property that was lawfully entrusted to the accused, who only later misappropriates it — the dishonest intent arises after, not before, they received the property.

Does this section apply to employer-employee relationships?

Yes — it commonly applies where an employee, cashier, or agent entrusted with money or goods on the employer’s behalf dishonestly misappropriates them, which is a frequent basis for such complaints.

What does the prosecution typically need to prove?

They must establish that the accused was entrusted with the property or given dominion over it, and that they dishonestly misappropriated, converted, or disposed of it contrary to the terms of that trust — mere negligence or an honest business loss does not meet this standard.

Facing a case under this section?

Get a free case assessment from a verified criminal lawyer.

Talk to a Criminal Lawyer

This page is for general information only and is not a substitute for advice from a qualified advocate. Always verify against the current official bare act.