LegalGurus.in
⚖️ IPC · Section 411

Dishonestly receiving stolen property

This provision is now BNS Section 317 (Dishonestly receiving stolen property) under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, effective from 1 July 2024. FIRs registered after that date cite the new section number.

What does this section state?

This section punishes anyone who dishonestly receives or retains property, knowing or having reason to believe it to be stolen. It targets the person on the "receiving end" of a theft or robbery, rather than the person who actually committed the original offence — recognising that a market for stolen goods encourages further theft.

"Reason to believe" is a lower threshold than actual proof of knowledge — it can be inferred from suspicious circumstances, such as receiving valuable goods at an unusually low price, from an unreliable source, or without any documentation. Once such circumstances are shown, the burden shifts to the accused to explain how they came to possess the property.

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita continues this offence under Section 317 without substantive change.
Punishment Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both
Triable By Any Magistrate
Bailable Bailable
Cognizable Cognizable
Compoundable Non Compoundable

Frequently Asked Questions

Is IPC Section 411 bailable?

This is a bailable offence, meaning bail can generally be granted as a matter of right by the police or the court.

What is the punishment under this section?

Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both. Courts have discretion based on the facts of each case, and the actual outcome can vary.

Can a case under this section be compounded (settled)?

No — this is a non-compoundable offence. The complainant cannot withdraw the case by private settlement; prosecution continues regardless of any compromise.

Does the person need to be certain the property was stolen for this section to apply?

No — the law only requires that they knew, or had reason to believe, the property was stolen. Reason to believe can be inferred from suspicious circumstances, even without direct proof of actual knowledge.

Can someone be charged under this section even if they didn’t commit the original theft?

Yes — this section specifically targets the person who later receives or retains stolen property, separately from whoever committed the original theft or robbery.

How is this different from Section 414 (assisting in concealment of stolen property)?

Section 411 punishes actually receiving or retaining stolen property. Section 414 punishes voluntarily assisting in concealing or disposing of stolen property, even without personally taking possession of it — the two often overlap but focus on slightly different conduct.

Facing a case under this section?

Get a free case assessment from a verified criminal lawyer.

Talk to a Criminal Lawyer

This page is for general information only and is not a substitute for advice from a qualified advocate. Always verify against the current official bare act.