This provision is now BNS Section 317 (Dishonestly receiving stolen property) under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, effective from 1 July 2024. FIRs registered after that date cite the new section number.
Is IPC Section 411 bailable?
This is a bailable offence, meaning bail can generally be granted as a matter of right by the police or the court.
What is the punishment under this section?
Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both. Courts have discretion based on the facts of each case, and the actual outcome can vary.
Can a case under this section be compounded (settled)?
No — this is a non-compoundable offence. The complainant cannot withdraw the case by private settlement; prosecution continues regardless of any compromise.
Does the person need to be certain the property was stolen for this section to apply?
No — the law only requires that they knew, or had reason to believe, the property was stolen. Reason to believe can be inferred from suspicious circumstances, even without direct proof of actual knowledge.
Can someone be charged under this section even if they didn’t commit the original theft?
Yes — this section specifically targets the person who later receives or retains stolen property, separately from whoever committed the original theft or robbery.
How is this different from Section 414 (assisting in concealment of stolen property)?
Section 411 punishes actually receiving or retaining stolen property. Section 414 punishes voluntarily assisting in concealing or disposing of stolen property, even without personally taking possession of it — the two often overlap but focus on slightly different conduct.
Facing a case under this section?
Get a free case assessment from a verified criminal lawyer.
Talk to a Criminal LawyerThis page is for general information only and is not a substitute for advice from a qualified advocate. Always verify against the current official bare act.